David Brain writes,
"in this years’ Edelman Trust Barometer we asked opinion leaders in 18 countries about the news sources they rely on most for information on companies. Not surprisingly, local sources dominated, but three global brands appeared regularly among the local names. Most of us could probably have guessed the BBC and CNN would be mentioned, but the number of respondents ticking the box marked Google confirms that the concept of ‘search engine’ and ‘news source’ are becoming less distinct. Last I looked, Google did not employ a single reporter."
[The graph on the original post proves interesting and is certainly worth a look.]
Google, Brain points out, has recently launched a local news service. The post announcing the new service explains how Google does it:
"We’re not simply looking at the byline or the source, but instead we analyze every word in every story to understand what location the news is about and where the source is located."
A look at the Google News Local page for St. Albans, a small City in the county of Hertfordshire, England, pulls up some relevant content but is also quite noisy, with the algorithm also pulling in headlines from West Virginia and Vermont USA and Australia. Useful then, I suppose, if you happen to be searching for news on a location with a unique place name but otherwise not so great.
There's also, hiding over on the left side of the page, a new location specific blog search. The top results for St. Albans were spot on but further down there's the same problem - the algorythm seems unable to distinguish between multiple cities named St. Albans and, worse, picks up lots of classified advertisements, newspaper articles and other non-blog content.
It's a good idea but, for me at least, not good enough to be very useful for locality specific searches - and serves as a reminder that fancy algorithms can't yet match human editorial judgement.






Hi Robin
Try a search with "St Albans + UK" to tidy up the results a little.
I'm impressed with the service, and when subscribed to via RSS it groups related stories together - useful for bigger cities.
Posted by: Craig McGinty | 12 February 2008 at 03:54 PM
My trouble with Google blog search has been as much the noise, though there is plenty, it is that when you get to the state and local level there are so many blogs it misses completely with tons of dead-on content, but the only way you can know that is to already know your local blogosphere really well.
Posted by: Dave Mastio | 12 February 2008 at 06:32 PM
It is interesting that the regional press in the UK seem to see ultra-local BBC services as their main threat, whilst Google are quietly doing this kind of thing in the background, pretty much free from any UK regulation whatsoever...
Posted by: Martin Belam | 12 February 2008 at 11:54 PM
Try living in Jersey and getting anything about that patch from Google News or Blog Search - it always comes up with either New Jersey or sport stories (Jersey top).
But this could be a useful tool - maybe as a Google Maps mashup so you can ultra-localise it.
Maybe the solution to this would be geo-ip tags on every blog post - in fact maybe thats a good solution for bloggers looking to get a higher profile position when writing about a specific place regularly.
Posted by: Ryan Morrison | 22 February 2008 at 12:22 AM